<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RoS International Ltd &#124; Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ros.jobs/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>What our Candidates say about us</title>
		<link>http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?p=18</link>
		<comments>http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?p=18#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RoS</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Candidate Feedback]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past I have applied for various jobs within different agencies however I have never had such a positive response as that which I received from RoS.
The position I originally applied for had already been filled however RoS gave me an informal call to inform me of the situation and to gain an initial idea [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past I have applied for various jobs within different agencies however I have never had such a positive response as that which I received from RoS.</p>
<p>The position I originally applied for had already been filled however RoS gave me an informal call to inform me of the situation and to gain an initial idea for what type of role I was looking for. During the telephone conversation they mentioned about another job, which had become available. Whilst I knew very little about temping and had never actually considered such type of employment, Leanne listened to all of my questions and gave me well informed answers, subsequently, an interview was arranged and I was sent further details of the position I was applying for. After the interview RoS provided me feedback and to my delight I was offered the job. Having fulfilled my temporary contract I have now been offered a permanent position with the organisation.</p>
<p>Throughout my time with RoS I have always felt that I can approach the team with any queries or issue that may arise, they always responded in an efficient and timely manner and have provided me feedback and to my delight I was offered a permanent position with the organisation.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"> &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Throughout my time with RoS I have always felt that I can approach the team with any queries or issues that may arise, they always responded in an efficient and timely manner and have provided me with useful advice and their full support at all times. I would like to thank all of the team at RoS, in particularly Leanne Coulman for all the help and time given to me. I would recommend RoS International Ltd to anyone as I have nothing but positive comments about them and would definately use them again in the future.I used RoS in May 2007. I found the staff brilliant in the way they dealt with me, like nothing was a chore. I will admit that I was a little dubious at first as I didn’t realise they helped find permanent positions. I am extremely happy with the service I received; I was put forward for interviews, and then sent the necessary information i.e. Paperwork with times/dates etc., the next day. I received a much-needed ‘good luck’ call before the interview and was invited to call RoS afterwards to discuss how the interview went. I was kept well informed in the ‘waiting’ period. When I was offered a position I received a call giving me the option. (I accepted) I felt so happy that I didn’t get pushed or rushed into anything. I would 100% recommend RoS to anyone. Keep up the good work RoS!!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">RoS helped me get a job as a Pre-Sales and Technical Advisor, was really helpful and told me everything I needed to know with plenty of useful tips along the way, the new jobs working out great and I couldn&#8217;t be happier with it.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I have been very pleased with Steve Ball and the Hull Office.  I have worked for RoS since October 2006.  My wages have been accurate and always on time.  New timesheets are sent out in a timely fashion and I have no complaints about the service I receive and would not hesitate to recommend the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=18</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxman to investigate MSC&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?p=14</link>
		<comments>http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?p=14#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Managed Service Companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server1.fxinternet.com/~ros.jobs/blog/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSC legislation
HM Revenue &#038; Customs issues warning on Managed Service Company legislation
HM Revenue &#038; Customs (HMRC)  has issued new guidance  on the Managed Service Company (MSC) legislation, and warns that it intends to take action against non-compliant companies.
HMRC says that where it considers that companies and partnerships otherwise fall within the Managed Service [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSC legislation</p>
<p>HM Revenue &#038; Customs issues warning on Managed Service Company legislation</p>
<p>HM Revenue &#038; Customs (HMRC)  has issued new guidance  on the Managed Service Company (MSC) legislation, and warns that it intends to take action against non-compliant companies.</p>
<p>HMRC says that where it considers that companies and partnerships otherwise fall within the Managed Service Company legislation, but claim not to be MSCs because the provider is an officer/partner of the intermediary, these companies and partnerships are in fact MSCs.</p>
<p>&#8220;HMRC will now look for suitable cases to investigate and, where appropriate, challenge and litigate.&#8221;</p>
<p>The three types of intermediaries identified by HMRC as being potential &#8216;targets&#8217; are:</p>
<p>the &#8217;self-employed model&#8217; where contractors work as sole traders via a specialist company<br />
the self-employed&#8217; model as above but under Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) rules.</p>
<p><strong>Offshore providers</strong></p>
<p>HMRC says the guidance has been issued after it &#8220;considered fully&#8221; the arguments advanced by various types intermediaries as to why they are not MSCs.</p>
<p>Martin Hesketh, managing director of accountancy, tax advice and financial support services provider Brookson, told Recruiter that the guidance was a clear message that the Revenue was serious at &#8220;enforcing the MSC legislation&#8221;, including the debt transfer provisions. These could affect agencies, where they were involved with non-compliant companies, added Hesketh.</p>
<p>The guidance is contained on HMRC&#8217;s website:</p>
<p><a href="http://ase.emv3.com/I?a=A9X7CkCPJj,XsIhvz,bMfBzgSg">http://ase.emv3.com/I?a=A9X7CkCPJj,XsIhvz,bMfBzgSg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=14</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bulletin From the REC</title>
		<link>http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?p=6</link>
		<comments>http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?p=6#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Managed Service Companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server1.fxinternet.com/~ros.jobs/blog/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Treasury consultation on ‘Managed Services Companies’ A consultation on changing the tax regime for ‘managed services companies’ was launched by the Treasury on Wednesday, the day of the Chancellor’s pre-budget report. The consultation seeks to change the way in which a large number of contractors are taxed when they work through composite companies. The intention [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Treasury consultation on ‘Managed Services Companies’ A consultation on changing the tax regime for ‘managed services companies’ was launched by the Treasury on Wednesday, the day of the Chancellor’s pre-budget report. The consultation seeks to change the way in which a large number of contractors are taxed when they work through composite companies. The intention is that composites will have to pay PAYE and National Insurance contributions of contractors working through these companies on all earnings related to employment from April 2007. There is also a suggestion that should it prove impossible to recover unpaid tax from a composite company then third parties, such as recruitment agencies, would be liable for the unpaid tax. With respect to tax refunds for travel, it is intended to prevent the practice whereby contractors claim tax relief for travel from their home to their place of work to bring them into line with other employees. The REC recognises that these proposals will have a large impact on the recruitment industry. The Treasury estimates that 250 000 workers currently work through composite companies and that they will be able to recover £350 million from these changes to the system. The REC will be responding with a strong collective voice to these changes and will consult with other stakeholders. An initial meeting with the Professional Contractors Group was held yesterday. To ensure that members concerns are fully taken into account the REC will consult the Board, Employment Policy Committee and relevant sector groups on these changes. If you have any initial comments on the Treasury’s consultation please e-mail Jason.clayton@rec.uk.com The REC External Relations team will then feed the results of this consultation back to the Treasury and will work to ensure that any changes do not create additional bureaucracy for the recruitment industry.</p>
<p>The Treasury consultation can be read at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/pre_budget_report/prebud_pbr06/other_docs/prebus_pbr06_odmanagedservices.cfm">http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/pre_budget_report/prebud_pbr06/other_docs/prebus_pbr06_odmanagedservices.cfm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=6</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Umbrella Companies the Answer?</title>
		<link>http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?p=1</link>
		<comments>http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?p=1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Umbrella Companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server1.fxinternet.com/~ros.jobs/blog/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the mad rush to get out of Managed Service Companies in April 2007, many contract workers that felt that they would normally fall foul of IR35, have turned to Umbrella companies rather than going PAYE. The Umbrella company promises to save the contractor money by not paying so much tax as they say they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the mad rush to get out of Managed Service Companies in April 2007, many contract workers that felt that they would normally fall foul of IR35, have turned to Umbrella companies rather than going PAYE. The Umbrella company promises to save the contractor money by not paying so much tax as they say they have dispensations from the Tax office to pay the contractor tax free expenses. It is a bit of a minefield that is shrouded in myths and preconceptions.</p>
<p>To help you separate the myths from the facts, contractorumbrella.com have compiled a list of common misconceptions and the truth that lies behind them:</p>
<p><strong>Myth: </strong>A special dispensation with the Inland Revenue means one company can allow freelancers to claim more expenses than another.</p>
<p><strong>Fact: </strong>A dispensation relieves a company from reporting expense payments and benefits on a P11D form. The dispensation applies to the company’s accounting practices rather than what you can claim as an individual. As a contractor, you can only claim those expenses that are approved by the Inland Revenue and they must be supported by receipts. H M Revenue and Customs does not &#8220;approve&#8221; any particular composite or umbrella companies - Extract from an email received from the Inland Revenue.</p>
<p><strong>Myth: </strong>A subsistence payment is an expense I can claim, without receipts, for being out of the house more than a certain amount of hours per day.</p>
<p><strong>Fact: </strong>A subsistence payment is, by definition, one that does not have to be supported by receipts. The only subsistence payment permitted by the Inland Revenue is £5 per night (£10 if abroad) for each night spent away from home during the course of the contract. All other expense claims must be supported by receipts according to Inland Revenue legislation. &#8220;I can confirm that contractors cannot automatically claim £21 per day (or any other amount) for each day they are at work. It is also worth saying the Inland Revenue would not give general approval of a company&#8217;s expenses policy. A dispensation would never cover large amounts of unsupported expenditure&#8221; - Extract taken a letter received from the Inland Revenue regarding daily allowances.</p>
<p><strong>Myth: </strong>I can claim a meal allowance as an expense</p>
<p><strong>Fact: </strong>You can claim actual meal costs whilst you are working at a remote site, away from your normal place of work, or when staying away home overnight but daily claims for meals are not permitted. It is the Inland Revenue’s belief that you need to eat regardless of whether you are at work or not so the meal costs are not wholly attributable the contract. The cost of food, drink and accommodation is not in general an expense incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, since everyone must eat in order to live&#8230;</p>
<p>- Extract taken from the Inland Revenue website <a href="http://www.hmrc.gov.uk">http://www.hmrc.gov.uk</a></p>
<p><strong>Myth: </strong>Some Umbrella Companies charge a high fee but they can guarantee that I will pay less tax.</p>
<p><strong>Fact: </strong>All Umbrella Companies are controlled by the Inland Revenue. Your tax paid is dependant on your personal tax code, National Insurance contributions are a fixed percentage and you can only claim those expenses that are permitted by the Inland Revenue. Remember, a dispensation means that the Umbrella Company does not need to see your receipts; it does not mean that you don&#8217;t have to have them! The only factor that should affect your take home pay is the Umbrella Companies fees and whether they retain any money for holiday or sick pay.</p>
<p><strong>Myth: </strong>An online calculator only needs my hourly or daily rate to work out my earnings.</p>
<p><strong>Fact: </strong>Your net earnings will be affected by your tax code and the expenses that you can legally claim. An online calculator should operate using a standard tax code and a calculator that does not ask for your expenses will assume a figure. This means that the calculation will never be accurate as everyone&#8217;s expenses are different.</p>
<p><strong>Myth: </strong>An umbrella company or composite company can pay me a minimum salary and dividends, which will earn me more money.</p>
<p><strong>Fact: </strong>Being paid salary and dividends would be more financially beneficial to you, however you can only be paid in this way if your contract is IR35 friendly (outside IR35). If your contract fails IR35 (inside IR35) you can only be paid through PAYE whether you are using an umbrella company or running your own limited company. &#8230;then the service company will have to deduct and account for tax under PAYE and Class 1 National Insurance contributions in respect of that worker on (broadly) all of the money the service company receives from the client in respect of work done for the client by that worker.</p>
<p>- Extract taken from Composite Service Companies and the &#8216;Service Company&#8217; legislation (&#8217;IR35&#8242;) on the Inland Revenue website <a href="http://www.hmrc.gov.uk">http://www.hmrc.gov.uk</a></p>
<p><strong>Myth: </strong>I can pay part of my salary to my partner for admin etc to minimise my tax contributions.</p>
<p><strong>Fact: </strong>Under HMRC Section 660A this is not possible.</p>
<p><strong>Myth: </strong>I can just switch Umbrella Company when I breach the 24-month rule and continue to claim expenses.</p>
<p><strong>Fact: </strong>Moving Umbrella Company will not change the situation as the rule applies to your actual place of work rather than the company you use. A workplace is deemed as a temporary site providing your attendance lasts no longer than 24 months. After 24 months a workplace is viewed more as a permanent site, and if you spend 40% or more of your time at the same site, you are no longer able to claim travel between home and that place or accommodation expenses.</p>
<p>The following link is an example of the 24-month rule, taken from the Inland Revenue website: <a href="http://www.hmrc.gov.uk">http://www.hmrc.gov.uk</a></p>
<p><strong>Myth: </strong>I am protected from investigation from the Inland Revenue by my umbrella company.</p>
<p><strong>Fact: </strong>If you claim expenses fraudulently and the Inland Revenue become aware of it you will be investigated and you will be liable for any underpayments of tax and associated penalties. It is worth noting that the Inland Revenue do investigate and no company can offer you protection against an investigation. Direct from Inland Revenue website: Where we find that the incorrect classification has been applied in respect of a particular engagement, we have a duty to ensure things are put right for the past and, where appropriate, for the future. Interest and penalties may be charged on any additional tax/NICs due as a result of any review or enquiry. <a href="http://www.hmrc.gov.uk">http://www.hmrc.gov.uk</a></p>
<p><strong>Myth: </strong>An offshore umbrella company can reduce my tax and NI liabilities because UK tax regulations do not apply to them.</p>
<p><strong>Fact: </strong>Extract taken directly from HMRC website www.hmrc.gov.uk If you would have been liable to UK tax and NICs had you been employed directly by the client, you must pay UK tax and NICs under these rules, whether or not your service company is located in the UK. If an offshore company fails to deduct and account for PAYE tax and NICs under the legislation, liability to pay tax and NICs can be transferred to you. HMRC has powers to obtain details of payments to offshore companies from the records of clients and agencies. Our opinion of Umbrella Company&#8217;s at RoS International is that although at first glance Umbrella companies may be able to save a lot of money, but it is only a temporary solution, especially if your contract runs for more than 24 months with the same client, there are a lot of potential pitfalls that a temporary worker may fall into, and ultimately get themselves into deep bother with HRMC. Whilst we do not turn away contractors that are using Umbrella Co.s we do not recommend it as a way of saving a significant amount of money, once the fees have been paid to the Umbrella Co. a much safer way is to be PAYE through the agency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ros.jobs/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
